Homes For Space Shuttles

Discuss aviation related topics.

Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby Kerberos » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:13 pm

With the end of the Shuttle Era presumably near, does anyone know where the retired orbiters will be put on display?
User avatar
Kerberos
star
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:35 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby MeteorWayne » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:18 pm

One will certainly wind up at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum....
"Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
"The same thing we do every night, Pinky... try to take over the world!"
User avatar
MeteorWayne
local group
 
Posts: 15951
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby newsartist » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:21 pm

MeteorWayne wrote:One will certainly wind up at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum....

They are too fragile for outdoor display,

I would suggest placing one in the Smithsonian, and shifting Enterprise to Edwards AFB/DFRC, where it actually made history.

I suspect that the other two will go to whoever comes up with the funding to erect a display building first?

Any temporary housing would require that NASA retain at least one of the SCA 747s, for transfer to a final site. I'm not sure if that is budgeted.
newsartist
asteroid
 
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:17 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby drwayne » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:38 am

They had a boilerplate model outdoors in Huntsville for years, so I suspect that they will not put up the
$ for setting up an indoor display, but I could be wrong. :)
User avatar
drwayne
solar system
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby Testing » Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:03 am

Perhaps one will end up at Dayton, OH. They have a pretty fine collection.
Testing
planet
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby drwayne » Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:56 am

One of my disappointments is that I have not had a chance to go there yet.
User avatar
drwayne
solar system
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby Kerberos » Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:27 pm

I love Dayton, even if it is the Air Force. :)
User avatar
Kerberos
star
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:35 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby drwayne » Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:21 pm

I believe the word is pronounced

Air Farce

;)
User avatar
drwayne
solar system
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby Kerberos » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:34 pm

hehehe :D I love picking on my buddies in the AF. All in good fun, of course.
User avatar
Kerberos
star
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:35 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby drwayne » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:03 am

Of course,, a coworker had a good zinger for the Navy folks:

"There's a reason the put those folks on boats and send them way the heck out on the water"


;)
User avatar
drwayne
solar system
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby Kerberos » Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:13 pm

hehe :mrgreen:

The non flight-rated guys use to hate it when we referred to the carrier as a boat. :D
User avatar
Kerberos
star
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:35 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby jim48 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:28 am

Okay. To save time let us forget, as in Just-Put-It-Out-Of-Your-Alleged-Mind that I am the only real, genuine, bonafide, honest-to-God scientist here at SDC. Y'all just imagined that!!! And of course forget that I live in Florida!!! I'm thinking the Kennedy Space Center, hmm? Just a thought.
User avatar
jim48
solar system
 
Posts: 3186
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby hewes » Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:41 pm

Home for the Orbiters is CALIFORNIA.
User avatar
hewes
rock
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby jim48 » Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:13 am

hewes wrote:Home for the Orbiters is CALIFORNIA.


FLORIDA.
User avatar
jim48
solar system
 
Posts: 3186
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby hewes » Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:03 pm

Eat our rocket dust. C A L I F O R N I A.
User avatar
hewes
rock
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby kiwigavin » Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:20 pm

They are too fragile for outdoor display


..and don't that sum up the whole last 30-year-long dead end...
kiwigavin
molecule
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby jim48 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:20 am

hewes wrote:Eat our rocket dust. C A L I F O R N I A.


One for California. One for Florida. Problem solved. Peace. ;)
User avatar
jim48
solar system
 
Posts: 3186
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby ZenGalacticore » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:59 pm

I'm going to make a small diner out of Atlantis and serve chili dogs out of it at Kennedy, near the National Seashore.

NewsArtist- Too fragile to be outside? I think you meant too precious, right?

Oh wait. Better idea. Turn two of them each into men and women's public restrooms to represent how Americans crap on their space program. Yeah, pee on it you ungrateful, complacent, spoiled, indifferent, apathetic bastards!
User avatar
ZenGalacticore
solar system
 
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 3:01 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby tanstaafl76 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:46 pm

Preferably somewhere with a nice climate that doesn't experience foam storms.
User avatar
tanstaafl76
asteroid
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am

Re: Homes For Space Shuttles

Postby CalliArcale » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:45 pm

Kerberos wrote:hehe :mrgreen:

The non flight-rated guys use to hate it when we referred to the carrier as a boat. :D


I've seen boats that are about as long as a carrier. Lakers (mostly ore carriers), though ginormous, are traditionally referred to as "boats" because their size confines them to the Great Lakes. Too big to pass through the Seaway. The SS Paul Tregurtha is longer than a Nimitz-class carrier. (By the same token, supercarriers cannot pass *into* the Great Lakes. Anything over 740 ft is right out.) Ironically, these big lakers are on the way out; with the American automotive industry foundering, more of the taconite from northern MN is now going overseas, which means more salties have to come in.

So, boat. Nyaaah.

Oh, and what to do with the Orbiters? Definitely should go in proper indoor museum storage. Just like any other aircraft that we really really really care about. I mean, outdoor exhibits are cool, but they do take a beating from the elements. Even regular stuff like P-51s suffer.
User avatar
CalliArcale
galaxy
 
Posts: 5638
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 1999 12:00 am
Next

Return to Aviation